Printable Version
Storm Builds Over House Panel Choice
By Julia Malone, Cox News Service
November 21, 2006
House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi has set off a power struggle among fellow Democrats and drawn unusually dire warnings from editorial writers coast-to-coast as suspense builds over who will chair the House intelligence committee.
Pelosi, who
has already named most of the committee heads
along traditional seniority lines, has balked
at picking fellow California Rep. Jane Harman,
who is now the top Democrat on the highly
sensitive intel panel.
Powerful civil
rights groups are pressing her to pick the No.
2 in seniority, Rep. Alcee Hastings. But
critics and newspaper editorials from the New
York Times to the Los Angeles Times, as well as
a raft of columnists, say that choice would
guarantee a public relations disaster for
Democrats, who have pledged to end the "culture
of corruption" in the capital.
Hastings,
a Florida lawmaker and former federal judge,
was impeached on corruption charges nearly 20
years ago. Pelosi was among the overwhelming
majority of House Democrats who voted for his
impeachment.
Even so, the Black
Leadership Forum, a coalition of groups
including the NAACP and the Congressional Black
Caucus, has sent a letter to Pelosi saying the
forum expects her to select Hastings, along
with other veteran black lawmakers who are in
line for top House posts. Most of those wishes
have been fulfilled, but the intelligence spot
is still unfilled.
Conservative
Democrats, known as the "Blue Dog" coalition,
are pressing the incoming speaker to pick
Harman, whose moderate views they
support.
Potential compromise choices
include Rep. Silvestre Reyes of Texas, a
veteran of the U.S. Border Patrol, or Rep. Anna
Eshoo of California. Both now serve on the
intelligence panel.
Pelosi has sent
clear signals that she plans to skip over
Harman, who has been criticized by some
Democrats for not being tough enough in
criticizing the Bush administration's Iraq
policies.
Spokesman Drew Hammill said
Tuesday that the Select Committee on
Intelligence, as it is formally called, is
different from other panels. "Seniority doesn't
carry over from Congress to Congress," he said,
adding that the speaker could not only change
the membership but pick "virtually any" House
member to be chairman.
He said she would
announce her selection no later than early
January.
Former Rep. Timothy Roemer,
co-chairman of the Sept. 11 commission, said
his advice to Pelosi would be "to be creative"
in her choice.
Roemer, who was a "Blue
Dog" Democrat when he served in the House, said
the decision would be one of the most important
for the new speaker. "It's like the president
picking a cabinet," he said, adding that the
intelligence committee post is a key indicator
for the party's foreign policy
positions.
"This is no short order cook"
job, he added. "She needs to get somebody who
is an articulate spokesperson, open to new
ideas, (who) can be effective in the media, and
also work in a bipartisan
manner."
Roemer suggested that Pelosi
could go outside the committee to select Rep.
Norm Dicks of Washington, who previously served
on the intelligence panel; Rep. Rahm Emanuel,
the Illinois lawmaker who led the party's
successful election campaign in the House and
who previously worked in the Clinton White
House; or Rep. Adam Schiff of California,
currently serving on the House International
Relations Committee.
Asked about the
reaction if Pelosi should pick Hastings as
chairman, Roemer said, "There will be a beehive
full of Republicans with their talking points
already written, ready to go after whoever she
picks. She has to make sure she doesn't give
them a lot of ammunition on this particular
appointment."
Georgia Rep. Sanford
Bishop, a member of both the Blue Dog Democrats
and the Congressional Black Caucus, said he
supports Hastings and said he thinks Hastings'
impeachment wouldn't "have any effect at
all."
Bishop said Hastings' seven terms
of House service have been "impeccable."
Hastings has "paid his dues" as a lawmaker,
said the Georgian, who was not a member of the
House in 1988-89, when then-Federal District
Court Judge Hastings was impeached for
conspiring to solicit bribes from criminal
defendants. Hastings had been prosecuted and
acquitted in court, but the
Democratic-controlled Congress later found the
charges credible and removed him from the
bench.
Asked how he would respond if
Pelosi skipped over Hastings for the
intelligence post, Bishop said, "I would defer
to the leader."
He added: "Regardless of
who gets the appointment, it will cause someone
to be discomforted."
###